Reference: Silver, L. W., Edwards, R. J., Neaves, L., Manning, A. D., Hogg, C. J., & Banks, S. (2025). A reference genome for the eastern bettong ( Bettongia gaimardi). F1000Research, 13, 1544. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.157851.1
Abstract
The eastern or Tasmanian bettong ( Bettongia gaimardi) is one of four extant bettong species and is listed as ‘Near Threatened’ by the IUCN. We sequenced short read data on the 10x system to generate a reference genome 3.46Gb in size and contig N50 of 87.36Kb and scaffold N50 of 2.93Mb. Additionally, we used GeMoMa to provide and accompanying annotation for the reference genome. The generation of a reference genome for the eastern bettong provides a vital resource for the conservation of the species.
Reference: M.W. Jayamanna Mohottige, A. Juhász, M.G. Nye-Wood, K.A. Farquharson, U. Bose, M.L. Colgrave. 2024. Beyond nutrition: Exploring immune proteins, bioactive peptides, and allergens in cow and Arabian camel milk. Food Chemistry, 467. 142471, 10.1016/j.foodchem.2024.142471.
Abstract
Bovine milk has dominated the dairy segment, yet alternative milk sources are gaining attention due to perceived superior health benefits, with immune proteins and bioactive peptides (BPs) contributing to these benefits. Fractionation affects protein recovery and composition. Here, the cream fraction resulted in the highest yield of proteins, identifying 1143 camel and 851 cow proteins. The cream fraction contained a significantly higher concentration of immune system-related proteins. Straightforward filtration and protein precipitation methods achieved average BP detections of 170 and 177, compared to 31 by a solvent-solvent extraction method. Considering potentially allergenic proteins, 53 (camel) and 52 (cow) were identified. Of these, 62 % of the potential allergens in cow, had orthologous counterparts in camel milk. However, the major milk allergen β-lactoglobulin (β-Lg) was not detected in camel milk. Our results provide a comprehensive proteomic resource of camel and cow milk products, mapping potential allergens and BPs that affect health.
Reference: Cui J, Batley KC, Silver LW, McLennan EA, Hogg CJ, Belov K. Spatial variation in toll-like receptor diversity in koala populations across their geographic distribution. Immunogenetics. 2024 Nov 30;77(1):5. doi: 10.1007/s00251-024-01365-5
Abstract
The koala (Phascolarctos cinereus) is an iconic Australian species that is listed as endangered in the northern parts of its range due to loss of habitat, disease, and road deaths. Diseases contribute significantly to the decline of koala populations, primarily Chlamydia and koala retrovirus. The distribution of these diseases across the species’ range, however, is not even. Toll-like receptors (TLRs) play a crucial role in innate immunity by recognising and responding to various pathogens. Variations in TLR genes can influence an individual’s susceptibility or resistance to infectious diseases. The aim of this study was to identify koala TLR diversity across the east coast of Australia using 413 re-sequenced genomes at 30 × coverage. We identified 45 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) leading to 51 alleles within ten TLR genes. Our results show that the diversity of TLR genes in the koala forms four distinct genetic groups, which are consistent with the diversity of the koala major histocompatibility complex (MHC), another key immune gene family. The bioinformatics approach presented here has broad applicability to other threatened species with existing genomic resources.
Reference: McLennan, Elspeth A., Toby G. L. Kovacs, Luke W. Silver, Zhiliang Chen, Frederick R. Jaya, Simon Y. W. Ho, Katherine Belov, and Carolyn J. Hogg. 2025. “ Genomics Identifies Koala Populations at Risk across Eastern Australia.” Ecological Applications 35(1): e3062. https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.3062
Abstract
Koalas are an iconic, endangered, Australian marsupial. Disease, habitat destruction, and catastrophic mega-fires have reduced koalas to remnant patches of their former range. With increased likelihood of extreme weather events and ongoing habitat clearing across Australia, koala populations are vulnerable to further declines and isolation. Small, isolated populations are considered at risk when there is increased inbreeding, erosion of genomic diversity, and loss of adaptive potential, all of which reduce their ability to respond to prevailing threats. Here, we characterized the current genomic landscape of koalas using data from The Koala Genome Survey, a joint initiative between the Australian Federal and New South Wales Governments that aimed to provide a future-proofed baseline genomic dataset across the koala’s range in eastern Australia. We identified several regions of the continent where koalas have low genomic diversity and high inbreeding, as measured by runs of homozygosity. These populations included coastal sites along southeast Queensland and northern and mid-coast New South Wales, as well as southern New South Wales and Victoria. Analysis of genomic vulnerability to future climates revealed that northern koala populations were more at risk due to the extreme expected changes in this region, but that the adaptation required was minimal compared with other species. Our genomic analyses indicate that continued development, particularly linear infrastructure along coastal sites, and resultant habitat destruction are causing isolation and subsequent genomic erosion across many koala populations. Habitat protection and the formation of corridors must be employed for all koala populations to maintain current levels of diversity. For highly isolated koala populations, active management may be the only way to improve genomic diversity in the short term. If koalas are to be conserved for future generations, reversing their genomic isolation must be a priority in conservation planning.
Entering the final stage of a PhD is both a marathon and a sprint. After a quick 3-4 years of terminal windows, countless hours coding, latex gloves, tweaking plots to the perfect shade of maroon (#B03060), and obsessing over a turtle species that lives a world away, the world could be ending, and honestly, I wouldn’t even know.
One surprising obsession? Table spacing. Somehow, this has become the hill I’m willing to die on. Not to mention after three and a half years into postgrad education, I still don’t know whether it should be a comma or a semicolon. Who knew this was the pinnacle of academic thought? Shout-out to my colleagues who don’t blink when I send them scripts named things like “goNe_analysis__fix6_final_FINAL_v10.pbs” (you know who you are), and to my long-suffering supervisors who’ve received my manuscript drafts entitled “Manuscript_turtle_final_DEFSFinal4_v12.docx.” And Andrea—my fellow PhDer-in-crime who has joined me on the adventure. There’s something comforting in having a fellow office mate who reaches a delusion level just as unhinged as yours.
Honestly, perspective is nearly impossible when your days blur together into one big troubleshooting session, often caused by a stray space somewhere in a 94-line code. But at the end of the day the completion of a PhD is less about perfection or about how many pages are in pdf document you’ve spent years creating, and more about progress. My folders and directories may look like a chaotic labyrinth, but hey, they’re a testament to something resembling progress—90% of it’s stuff that would’ve looked like rocket science to me a couple of years ago. It’s about stepping back, handing in, disappearing, and leaving the pandora’s box of questions you opened during your thesis for the poor Honours student.
To anyone on the journey, hang in there. Or don’t, drop out and open a bakery if you feel like it. Either way, you’re not alone in those late-night bursts of productivity, never ending imposter syndrome, praying that the laptop you’ve run into the ground turns on every morning, or that compulsive need to move the plot legend just 0.5mm more to the left.
You’re the world expert in whatever obscure and niche little thing it is you do, even if no one, including you, fully understands it. Hold onto the fact that your work probably means something, and if it doesn’t, well, at least it’s given you something to do for the last few years.
As my daily reminder sticky-note says “it’s not that serious”.
Bilby release
Holly Nelson (PhD Student) is working on how we can use genomics to revolutionise threatened species management. From genome assembly to downstream analyses using whole-genome data, Holly is using her work to answer genetic questions on the Bellinger River Snapping Turtle, Koala, and other threatened species. Her work, in partnership with the NSW Governments Saving Our Species program, aims to create more robust conservation strategies that can be developed and applied together with wildlife managers.
Reference: Jayamanna Mohottige MW, Gardner CE, Nye-Wood MG, Farquharson KA, Juhász A, Belov K, Hogg CJ, Peel E, Colgrave ML. Bioactive components in the marsupial pouch and milk. Nutr Res Rev. 2024 Nov 18:1-12. doi: 10.1017/S0954422424000313.
Abstract
Marsupials give birth to immunologically naïve young after a relatively short gestation period compared with eutherians. Consequently, the joey relies significantly on maternal protection, which is the focus of the present review. The milk and the pouch environment are essential contributors to maternal protection for the healthy development of joeys. In this review, we discuss bioactive components found in the marsupial pouch and milk that form cornerstones of maternal protection. These bioactive components include immune cells, immunoglobulins, the S100 family of calcium-binding proteins, lysozymes, whey proteins, antimicrobial peptides and other immune proteins. Furthermore, we investigated the possibility of the presence of plurifunctional components in milk and pouches that are potentially bioactive. These compounds include caseins, vitamins and minerals, oligosaccharides, lipids and microRNAs. Where applicable, this review addresses variability in bioactive components during different phases of lactation, designed to fulfil the immunological needs of the growing pouch young. Yet, there are numerous additional research opportunities to pursue, including uncovering novel bioactive components and investigating their modes of action, dynamics, stability and ability to penetrate the gut epithelium to facilitate systemic effects.
Reference: Kosch, T.A., Torres-Sánchez, M., Liedtke, H.C. et al. The Amphibian Genomics Consortium: advancing genomic and genetic resources for amphibian research and conservation. BMC Genomics25, 1025 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-024-10899-7
Abstract
Amphibians represent a diverse group of tetrapods, marked by deep divergence times between their three systematic orders and families. Studying amphibian biology through the genomics lens increases our understanding of the features of this animal class and that of other terrestrial vertebrates. The need for amphibian genomic resources is more urgent than ever due to the increasing threats to this group. Amphibians are one of the most imperiled taxonomic groups, with approximately 41% of species threatened with extinction due to habitat loss, changes in land use patterns, disease, climate change, and their synergistic effects. Amphibian genomic resources have provided a better understanding of ontogenetic diversity, tissue regeneration, diverse life history and reproductive modes, anti-predator strategies, and resilience and adaptive responses. They also serve as essential models for studying broad genomic traits, such as evolutionary genome expansions and contractions, as they exhibit the widest range of genome sizes among all animal taxa and possess multiple mechanisms of genetic sex determination. Despite these features, genome sequencing of amphibians has significantly lagged behind that of other vertebrates, primarily due to the challenges of assembling their large, repeat-rich genomes and the relative lack of societal support. The emergence of long-read sequencing technologies, combined with advanced molecular and computational techniques that improve scaffolding and reduce computational workloads, is now making it possible to address some of these challenges. To promote and accelerate the production and use of amphibian genomics research through international coordination and collaboration, we launched the Amphibian Genomics Consortium (AGC, https://mvs.unimelb.edu.au/amphibian-genomics-consortium) in early 2023. This burgeoning community already has more than 282 members from 41 countries. The AGC aims to leverage the diverse capabilities of its members to advance genomic resources for amphibians and bridge the implementation gap between biologists, bioinformaticians, and conservation practitioners. Here we evaluate the state of the field of amphibian genomics, highlight previous studies, present challenges to overcome, and call on the research and conservation communities to unite as part of the AGC to enable amphibian genomics research to “leap” to the next level.
Reference: Silver LW, McLennan EA, Beaman J, da Silva KB, Timms P, Hogg CJ, Belov K. Using bioinformatics to investigate functional diversity: a case study of MHC diversity in koalas. Immunogenetics. 2024 Dec;76(5-6):381-395. doi: 10.1007/s00251-024-01356-6
Abstract
Conservation genomics can greatly improve conservation outcomes of threatened populations, including those impacted by disease. Understanding diversity within immune gene families, including the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) and toll-like receptors (TLR), is important due to the role they play in disease resilience and susceptibility. With recent advancements in sequencing technologies and bioinformatic tools, the cost of generating high-quality sequence data has significantly decreased and made it possible to investigate diversity across entire gene families in large numbers of individuals compared to investigating only a few genes or a few populations previously. Here, we use the koala as a case study for investigating functional diversity across populations. We utilised previous target enrichment data and 438 whole genomes to firstly, determine the level of sequencing depth required to investigate MHC diversity and, secondly, determine the current level of diversity in MHC genes in koala populations. We determined for low complexity, conserved genes such as TLR genes 10 × sequencing depth is sufficient to reliably genotype more than 90% of variants, whereas for complex genes such as the MHC greater than 20 × and preferably 30 × sequencing depth is required. We used whole genome data to identify 270 biallelic SNPs across 24 MHC genes as well as copy number variation (CNV) within class I and class II genes and conduct supertype analysis. Overall, we have provided a bioinformatic workflow for investigating variation in a complex immune gene family from whole genome sequencing data and determined current levels of diversity within koala MHC genes.
Reference: Shaw, R.E., Brockett, B., Pierson, J.C. et al. Building meaningful collaboration in conservation genetics and genomics. Conserv Genet25, 1127–1145 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-024-01636-4
Abstract
Genetic diversity is the foundation of biodiversity, and preserving it is therefore fundamental to conservation practice. However, global conservation efforts face significant challenges integrating genetic and genomic approaches into applied management and policy. As collaborative partnerships are increasingly recognized as key components of successful conservation efforts, we explore their role and relevance in the Australian context, by engaging with key entities from across the conservation sector, including academia, botanic gardens, herbaria, seed banks, governmental/non-governmental organisations, private industry, museums, Traditional Owners, Indigenous rangers, and zoos and aquaria. By combining perspectives from these entities with comprehensive literature review, we identified five guiding principles for conservation genetic and genomic research and explored the different elements of, and approaches to, collaboration. Our reflections suggest that there is a substantial overlap in research interests across the Australian conservation sector, and our findings show that collaboration is increasing. We discuss approaches to building collaborative partnerships, the reciprocal benefits of collaborating, and some remaining challenges associated with data generation, data collection, and cross-cultural considerations. We emphasise the need for long-term national resourcing for sample and data storage and consistency in collecting, generating and reporting genetic data. While informed by the Australian experience, our goal is to support researchers and practitioners to foster meaningful collaborations that achieve measurable management outcomes in conservation genetics and genomics, both in Australia and globally.
Reference: Nelson, H. V., Farquharson, K. A., Georges, A., McLennan, E. A., DeGabriel, J. L., Giese, M., Ormond, C., McFadden, M., Skidmore, A., Prangell, J., Belov, K., & Hogg, C. J. (2024). A genomic framework to assist conservation breeding and translocation success: A case study of a critically endangered turtle. Conservation Science and Practice, 6(10), e13204. https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.13204
Abstract
Conservation breeding programs are an effective approach to addressing biodiversity loss. Captive populations are managed to maintain genetic diversity, yet there remains an “implementation gap” in effectively translating molecular genetic data into management. Technological advancements are facilitating rapid generation of genetic data, increasing accessibility for breeding programs. In 2010, Frankham and colleagues proposed a six-stage process for establishing successful conservation breeding and release programs. Here, we describe the conservation breeding program for the critically endangered Bellinger River turtle (Myuchelys georgesi) and characterize the value of genetic sampling for informing management actions. By generating a chromosome-level genome and population genetic data, we investigated past and present diversity and assessed relatedness among captive founders. We present a framework modeled on Frankham and colleagues six stages to assist managers in implementing genetic data into actionable conservation strategies. This framework, and worked case study, for managers aims to better guide implementation of genetic approaches into conservation breeding programs.
